Author:
Simulacrum
<
nub
>
107.201.120.172
Use
this link
if you want to link to this message and its entire thread of discussion.
Date:
3/28/2016 9:48:54 AM
Subject:
RE: things in which i have discovered
I turn now to the subject of earth.
Much harm has been done by an unexamined reliance on books, so-called scientific journals, and the unexamined disinformation generated by NASA. For generations untold, schoolchildren have been taught that the earth is round. We have the aforementioned sources to blame for this appalling lie, and the more so because they have obscured the matter by revising their claims over time. For instance, they suggest that men knew of the earth's roundness long before Columbus, citing various ancient Greek texts purporting to accept the spherical theory. Then they add to the confusion by "correcting" their views based on photographs allegedly taken in space. Now they would have us believe that our planet is ovoid, as if such vast expanses of land and ocean could spread their infinite horizons over an object shaped more or less like an egg or a soccer ball being pulled out of shape in a gravitational simulation.
If you bother to seek out the truth, you will find that the earth is really flat. The notion of roundness or ovality comes from a misunderstanding of cartography. Renaissance map makers clearly demonstrated the flatness of our planet by spreading its length and breadth across a two-dimensional plane. Mapped (as opposed to globular) representations of the earth have followed this scheme ever since. If you subscribe to National Geographic magazine, eventually you'll be offered a flat representation of the earth's surface to hang on a wall. They know that this is the only truthful image of an unequivocally flat earth.
Now, to be fair, most of these flat-earth maps try to accommodate the round/ovate earth subscribers by presenting the planet in such a way that you could cut out the image with a pair of scissors and ham-handedly glue it together in a ball. This may make the round people happy, but the underlying intention is to represent the true flatness of our celestial home, in spite of the ways in which textbooks and NASA mislead us.
You may ask, "What does NASA have to gain by misrepresenting the genuine shape of the earth?"
I can only imagine that they add to their misplaced authority as government agency. Every time you take their images for granted, you add to their power, which they will one day use to effect their true agenda: submission to the alien overlords with whom they have been in contact for decades.
I dare not go further into this crisis, lest I attract the attention of NASA field agents (not to mention their counterparts employed by the mighty Pearson textbook mega-publisher empire). People disappear. People don't come back.
